The copolymerization of corn oil and elemental sulfur via inverse vulcanization
- Mark Yang
- Jun 1
- 4 min read

SULFURIC POLYMER
The copolymerization of corn oil and elemental sulfur via inverse vulcanization is an interesting approach to creating sustainable polymeric materials by leveraging bio-based feedstocks and excess sulfur, a byproduct of the petroleum industry. Below is a detailed explanation of the process, mechanism, and potential applications:
1. Concept of Inverse Vulcanization
Inverse vulcanization involves copolymerizing elemental sulfur (S₈) with organic crosslinkers (usually unsaturated compounds) at elevated temperatures (typically 120–160°C). Unlike traditional vulcanization (where small amounts of sulfur crosslink rubber), this method uses sulfur as the major component (50–90 wt%).

General mechanism of inverse vulcanization
2. Corn Oil as a Crosslinker
Corn oil is a triglyceride containing unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., linoleic acid, oleic acid) with carbon-carbon double bonds (C=C). These double bonds can react with sulfur radicals formed during ring-opening polymerization of S₈, leading to crosslinked polymeric networks.
Key Features of Corn Oil:
- Renewable & sustainable (vs. petrochemical crosslinkers).
- Multiple C=C bonds per triglyceride allow for extensive crosslinking.
- Low cost and abundant.
3. Copolymerization Mechanism
1. Sulfur Ring Opening:
- Heating S₈ above 159°C causes ring opening, forming diradical chains (Sₙ•).
- At lower temperatures (~130°C), dynamic S–S bonds allow reversible polymerization.
2. Radical Reaction with Corn Oil:
- Sulfur radicals attack the allylic positions of C=C bonds in corn oil.
- Forms C–S bonds, creating a crosslinked network.
3. Network Formation:
- The triglyceride structure of corn oil enables 3D crosslinking, stabilizing the sulfur-rich polymer.
4. Experimental Procedure (Example)
Materials:
- Elemental sulfur (S₈)
- Corn oil (refined, unsaturated)
- Optional: Catalysts (e.g., amines, bases) to enhance reactivity.
Steps:
1. Melt sulfur at ~160°C until a clear, dark-red liquid forms (S₈ rings open).
2. Add corn oil dropwise under stirring (e.g., 50–70 wt% sulfur, balance corn oil).
3. Maintain 130–160°C for 1–3 hours until homogeneous.
4. Pour into a mold and cool to room temperature.
Product:
- A brownish, rubbery solid (thermoset polymer).
- Insoluble in common solvents due to crosslinking.
5. Characterization & Properties
- FTIR: Confirms C–S bond formation (peaks at ~600–700 cm⁻¹).
- DSC/TGA: Shows thermal stability (decomposition >200°C).
- Mechanical Properties: Tunable based on S/corn oil ratio (flexible to rigid).
- Self-healing: Dynamic S–S bonds may enable repair.
6. Advantages
- Waste valorization: Uses excess sulfur.
- Biodegradability: Corn oil improves environmental compatibility vs. synthetic crosslinkers.
- Cost-effective: Simple process, no expensive monomers.
7. Challenges
- Odor: Residual sulfur can emit H₂S.
- Brittleness: High sulfur content may reduce toughness.
- Slow reactivity: Unsaturation in corn oil is less reactive than styrenics/dienes.
8. Potential Applications
- Agricultural films (slow-release fertilizers).
- Infrared optics (high refractive index from sulfur).
- Heavy metal adsorption (due to sulfur’s affinity for metals like Hg²⁺).
- Sustainable elastomers (e.g., coatings, sealants).
9. Future Directions
- Optimize feed ratios for better mechanical properties.
- Add fillers (e.g., carbon black, silica) to enhance strength.
- Explore other plant oils (e.g., soybean, linseed) for varied properties.
Conclusion
The copolymerization of corn oil and sulfur via inverse vulcanization offers a promising route to sustainable polymers. By combining renewable resources with industrial byproducts, this method aligns with green chemistry principles while creating materials with unique functionalities. Further research could refine the process for broader industrial adoption.
Great! Below are detailed reaction conditions and characterization techniques for the copolymerization of corn oil and sulfur via inverse vulcanization, along with optimization strategies.
1. Detailed Reaction Conditions
A. Typical Feed Ratio (Weight %)
Component | Range (wt%) | Effect on Material Properties |
Elemental Sulfur (S₈) | 50–90% | Higher sulfur → harder, more rigid material. |
Corn Oil | 10–50% | Higher oil → more flexible, rubbery behavior. |
Optimal Ratio | 70% S₈ / 30% Corn Oil | Balances rigidity and processability. |
B. Temperature & Time
Parameter | Optimal Range | Notes |
Reaction Temperature | 130–160°C | Below 130°C: Slow reaction. Above 160°C: Risk of H₂S gas release. |
Reaction Time | 1–3 hours | Longer time → higher crosslinking but may degrade oil. |
Mixing Method | Mechanical Stirring (200–500 rpm) | Ensures homogeneity. |
C. Optional Additives
Additive | Purpose | Effect |
Amine Catalysts (e.g., DABCO, Triethylamine) | Accelerate C=S bond formation | Reduces reaction time. |
Plasticizers (e.g., Glycerol, Dioctyl phthalate) | Improve flexibility | Lowers Tg (glass transition temp). |
Fillers (e.g., Carbon black, SiO₂, Clay) | Enhance mechanical strength | Increases tensile modulus. |
2. Characterization Techniques
A. Structural Analysis
Technique | Purpose | Expected Results |
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) | Confirm C–S bond formation | Peaks at 600–700 cm⁻¹ (C–S stretch), loss of C=C peaks (1650 cm⁻¹). |
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) (¹H, ¹³C) | Monitor unsaturation loss | Decrease in vinyl proton signals (5–6 ppm). |
Raman Spectroscopy | Detect S–S and C–S bonds | S–S (470 cm⁻¹), C–S (650 cm⁻¹). |
B. Thermal Properties
Technique | Purpose | Expected Results |
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) | Check thermal transitions | Tg (Glass Transition) ~ −20 to 50°C (depends on S/oil ratio). |
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) | Assess thermal stability | Decomposition starts >200°C (S–S bond cleavage). |
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) | Study viscoelasticity | Storage modulus (E’) and tan δ peaks indicate crosslink density. |
C. Mechanical & Physical Properties
Technique | Purpose | Expected Results |
Tensile Testing | Measure strength/elongation | Young’s Modulus: 10–500 MPa (tunable via S/oil ratio). |
Swelling Test (Solvent Resistance) | Check crosslinking | Low swelling in THF, toluene indicates good network formation. |
Hardness Test (Shore A/D) | Material stiffness | Shore A 30–90 (softer with more oil). |
D. Morphology & Microscopy
Technique | Purpose | Expected Results |
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) | Surface morphology | Homogeneous vs. phase-separated structures. |
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) | Crystallinity | Amorphous halo (no S₈ crystals → successful copolymerization). |
3. Optimization Strategies
A. Improving Reactivity
- Pre-heat corn oil (80°C) before adding to molten sulfur → reduces viscosity.
- Use microwave-assisted synthesis → faster, more uniform heating.
B. Reducing H₂S Emission
- Add basic compounds (e.g., Na₂CO₃, ZnO) → scavenges H₂S.
- Work under inert (N₂) atmosphere → prevents oxidation.
C. Enhancing Mechanical Properties
- Post-curing at 100°C for 1–2 hrs → increases crosslinking.
- Blend with other bio-oils (e.g., linseed oil) → higher unsaturation → stronger network.
4. Troubleshooting Common Issues
Problem | Possible Cause | Solution |
Brittle Material | Too much sulfur (>80%) | Increase corn oil (up to 40%). |
Sticky Polymer | Insufficient crosslinking | Extend reaction time or add catalyst. |
H₂S Smell | Overheating (>170°C) | Lower temperature, add ZnO. |
Phase Separation | Poor mixing | Stir vigorously, use surfactant. |
5. Advanced Modifications
- Click Chemistry Approach: Add dienophiles (e.g., maleimide) to enhance crosslinking.
- Hybrid Systems: Incorporate silica nanoparticles for reinforcement.
- Dynamic Covalent Bonds: Introduce disulfide exchangers for self-healing.
- Final Notes
- Scalability: This reaction is easily scalable for industrial use.
- Sustainability: Uses non-toxic, renewable corn oil and waste sulfur.
Applications: Ranges from agricultural films to heavy metal adsorbents.
Комментарии